From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Jan 29 19:56:40 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA17202
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 29 Jan 1996 19:56:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au (pp@bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au [130.102.2.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA17191
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 1996 19:56:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cc.uq.oz.au by bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au 
          id <11509-0@bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au>; Tue, 30 Jan 1996 13:55:09 +1000
Received: from netfl15a.devetir.qld.gov.au 
          by pandora.devetir.qld.gov.au (8.6.10/DEVETIR-E0.3a) with ESMTP 
          id NAA22858 for <hackers@freebsd.org>;
          Tue, 30 Jan 1996 13:52:11 +1000
Received: from localhost by netfl15a.devetir.qld.gov.au (8.6.8.1/DEVETIR-0.1) 
          id DAA07167; Tue, 30 Jan 1996 03:49:05 GMT
Message-Id: <199601300349.DAA07167@netfl15a.devetir.qld.gov.au>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.4 10/10/95
To: hackers@freebsd.org
cc: sysseh@devetir.qld.gov.au
Subject: LCC compiler - yes!
X-Face: 3}heU+2?b->-GSF-G4T4>jEB9~FR(V9lo&o>kAy=Pj&;oVOc<|pr%I/VSG"ZD32J>5gGC0N 
        7gj]^GI@M:LlqNd]|(2OxOxy@$6@/!,";-!OlucF^=jq8s57$%qXd/ieC8DhWmIy@J1AcnvSGV\|*! 
        >Bvu7+0h4zCY^]{AxXKsDTlgA2m]fX$W@'8ev-Qi+-;%L'CcZ'NBL!@n?}q!M&Em3*eW7,093nOeV8 
        M)(u+6D;%B7j\XA/9j4!Gj~&jYzflG[#)E9sI&Xe9~y~Gn%fA7>F:YKr"Wx4cZU*6{^2ocZ!YyR
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 13:49:04 +1000
From: Stephen Hocking <sysseh@devetir.qld.gov.au>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> 
> Back in june there was talk about the LCC compiler, and I got mail
> from a couble of interested parties. Well now I've found my old
> patches and put them into the 3.4B release with support for both
> static & shared libs. I've also done a fair bit of work getting it
> to understand long longs (ie 64bit ints), to be honest I can declare
> a variable and store a value in it, but its a start..
> 
> The reason for this letter is that I lost my old mail (or rather cannot
> find the backup tape) so I've lost the names of the interested parties..
> 
> So, anybody out there still interested in LCC ???
> 
Yes! I'd like to see how well it would go for a number of things. If you want 
to send your patches plus an ftp pointer where one can pull out the latest 
version of Lcc, I'd give it a go.

	Stephen
-- 

        I do not speak for the Worker's Compensation Board of Queensland -
                     They don't pay me enough for that!