From owner-freebsd-current Wed Aug 18 11:31: 4 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mail.camalott.com (mail.camalott.com [208.203.140.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EC3F14E30 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 11:30:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from joelh@gnu.org) Received: from detlev.UUCP (tex-32.camalott.com [208.229.74.32]) by mail.camalott.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA14231; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 13:30:30 -0500 Received: (from joelh@localhost) by detlev.UUCP (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA17485; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 13:22:44 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from joelh) To: "Matt Crawford" Cc: "Pleschutznig, Andreas" , "'Leif Neland'" , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Teergrubes [was Re: Dropping connections without RST] References: <199908172021.PAA04143@gungnir.fnal.gov> From: Joel Ray Holveck Date: 18 Aug 1999 13:22:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: "Matt Crawford"'s message of "Tue, 17 Aug 1999 15:21:49 -0500" Message-ID: <86n1vpvtho.fsf@detlev.UUCP> Lines: 16 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > process normally if the HELO and MAIL From/RCPT To look all right; > otherwise continue to read small gulps of the DATA at slow intervals, > then answer the final "." with a *temporary* failure code. I'd rather have spammers consume less of my CPU time and bandwidth, not have them keep coming back again and again. I suppose if you've got the computrons to waste, then it's okay. joelh -- Joel Ray Holveck - joelh@gnu.org Fourth law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message