From owner-freebsd-doc Mon May 28 15:42: 4 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from kawoserv.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de (kawoserv.kawo2.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.180.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9143737B423; Mon, 28 May 2001 15:42:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from alex@big.endian.de) Received: from zerogravity.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de (zerogravity.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de [134.130.181.28]) by kawoserv.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de (8.9.3/8.6.9) with ESMTP id AAA04125; Tue, 29 May 2001 00:41:59 +0200 Received: by zerogravity.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 51A7014AE3; Tue, 29 May 2001 00:41:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 00:41:59 +0200 From: Alexander Langer To: "Bruce A. Mah" Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: NO_* vs. NO* (was: Re: HEADS UP: RELNOTESng now default in -CURRENT, *.TXT files removed Message-ID: <20010529004159.F2225@zerogravity.kawo2.rwth-aachen.d> References: <200105251802.f4PI2fn25743@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> <20010527180939.A32462@kawoserv.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> <200105281849.f4SIndZ49917@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200105281849.f4SIndZ49917@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com>; from bmah@FreeBSD.ORG on Mon, May 28, 2001 at 11:49:39AM -0700 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 44 28 CA 4C 46 5B D3 A8 A8 E3 BA F3 4E 60 7D 7F X-PGP-at: finger alex@big.endian.de X-Verwirrung: Dieser Header dient der allgemeinen Verwirrung. Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Thus spake Bruce A. Mah (bmah@FreeBSD.ORG): > obrien and dd pointed out (correctly) that the desired behavior can be > made conditional on NODOC just as easily (which means one less Makefile > variable). (The rationale being that it's extremely unlikely that > someone would want docs but no release notes.) Yes, that's true. OTOH, I really wonder why we use NO* for such things (NODOC, NOCLEAN, [ports: NOPORTDOCS], ...), but NO_* for some disable knobs, like sendmail, bind, etc. This is quite inconsistent, even if it has historical reasons. Just read the section in make.conf which describes the various NO_KNOBS and wonder, why it's NOUUCP but NO_SENDMAIL :-) Odd. Alex --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iQEVAwUBOxLUNrRIIUSeqRcRAQEUiAf/Q3iebzVpvOHgAjpMD3XQXHsU8DwAbCvF n3O4u82UUIGhKocc82/5Xv0F2k8J7nakDHyqnK4gBbohAi6NtUbpr0+QOyOBaQpT SDRrFpW6WLdBiXD7NFAcgwarXB6evSjyeoySiYyto5e0llLXKgClU8fa06PV1tAJ RlsKsG8oBvk0rLzZRxMUT1zrkR8ZC0oslPXJVNc/aQhnVactXRWYWvxDuZAf9Opt lRwkbp/yIICsnSt3F3d93v5xXRLOKqMfKlHs07BeOF4EszMzRUgS3EudGgbYY4QF 97W9lBMEsDkRJHn4gKG0yV9FaovwzZ0WajHNqXydMQ9V5zr+QK9jgg== =SAHt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message