From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 24 14:52:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F3E1065752; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:52:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpetsmoker@rwxrwxrwx.net) Received: from smtp-vbr9.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr9.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F22D8FC19; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:52:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpetsmoker@rwxrwxrwx.net) Received: from roundcube.xs4all.nl (roundcube3.xs4all.nl [194.109.20.199]) by smtp-vbr9.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6OEq0k2014676; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:52:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from carpetsmoker@rwxrwxrwx.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from static.ip-080-246-203-130.signet.nl [80.246.203.130] with HTTP/1.1 (POST); Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:52:00 +0200 Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:52:00 +0200 From: Martin Tournoij To: Alex Dupre Message-ID: X-Sender: carpetsmoker@rwxrwxrwx.net (OUxhgBb2SqjzGavZNSUCLChF+KsosPDZ) User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: status of FreeBSD ports you maintain as of 20090705 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: carpetsmoker@rwxrwxrwx.net List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:52:10 -0000 On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:00:13 +0200, Alex Dupre wrote: > Martin Tournoij ha scritto: >> Really, I have better things to do, I would have liked to do this in a >> nicer way, but I've been waiting for more than a week to revert the >> maintainer switch > > Do you mean you never approved the switch, as stated in the commit log? > > Change maintainer to scjamorim@bsd.com.br > > Submitted by: scjamorim@bsd.com.br (to ports@) > Approved by: carpetsmoker@rwxrwxrwx.net (maintainer) Not explicitly, and in my original post I said ``will resign the maintainership of all my ports in the **coming weeks**, (For a few ports I have a few changes/ updates **in the pipeline I would like to finish**).'' Misunderstandings happen, and that's ok. I explained reassigning maintainership immediately was not my intention and asked to revert the changes, no word ever since ... Which is not so ok IMO...