From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jul 27 06:54:44 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA40416A41F
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:54:44 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from eti@erata.net)
Received: from s4.nc99.net (s4.nc99.net [65.98.58.122])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A6D543D46
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:54:44 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from eti@erata.net)
Received: (qmail 22182 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2005 02:54:43 -0400
Received: from 223.126.77.82.in-addr.arpa.cluj.rdsnet.ro (HELO ?10.10.10.5?)
	(82.77.126.223)
	by s4.nc99.net with (RC4-MD5 encrypted) SMTP; 27 Jul 2005 02:54:43 -0400
From: Iulian M <eti@erata.net>
Organization: Perlica Technologies
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:53:59 +0300
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1
References: <42E6BD98.1060300@tigergroup.org> <42E6C028.6020806@datacomm.ch>
In-Reply-To: <42E6C028.6020806@datacomm.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1228429.uJkUXVUz9e";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200507270954.03899.eti@erata.net>
Subject: Re: 4.11 vs. 5.4 stablity
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:54:44 -0000

--nextPart1228429.uJkUXVUz9e
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-6"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wednesday 27 July 2005 01:58, Benjamin Lutz wrote:
> Eriq wrote:
> > I am running 4.11 on a dual amd box and have found it solid as a rock
> > for running apache2, postgres, dns and postfix. But now I am thinking
> > of upgrading. I wonder if 5.4 is as stable  for these servers that
> > must run 24/7. And is it worth all the trouble to do, I have grown
> > pretty lazy :)

The bad part about an rock stable system that works flawlessly is that as a=
n=20
admin you do become lazy ... very lazy :). You should not change the os on=
=20
the server, at least not before testing (and learning) 5.X/6.X non critical=
=20
systems.

=2D-=20
Accuracy, n.:
	The vice of being right

--nextPart1228429.uJkUXVUz9e
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBC5y+LE4semV9hLhcRAuZvAKCb8Z4AqoJDDwFlqLZk3gHbPOZl1QCgpMhB
fxSDixHhPePfZjz69V9xPjg=
=8T61
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1228429.uJkUXVUz9e--