From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 12 07:38:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C50A216A4CE; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 07:38:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (eva.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.10.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A3BA43D5A; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 07:38:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j3C7cAj6089622 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:38:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from xdivac02@localhost) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id j3C7cA85089621; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:38:10 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:38:10 +0200 From: Divacky Roman To: John Baldwin Message-ID: <20050412073810.GA89527@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <20050406130909.GA90294@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <200504112038.32964.jhb@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200504112038.32964.jhb@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 147.229.10.14 cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: slow kbd input on 6-current on amd64@nforce3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 07:38:14 -0000 On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 08:38:32PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday 06 April 2005 09:09 am, Divacky Roman wrote: > > as I have mentioned on the list I have very slow keyboard input. it might > > be related to kbd not having an IRQ assigned. I repeat once again that it > > worked on 5.3R. > > Actually, now that I look at this, you have a buggy BIOS. It is lying and > claiming that some PCI interrupts are active-hi rather than active-low. Hmm, > the 5.3 dmesg you gave me included APIC, while this one does not. Does > disabling ACPI make your keyboard happy on 6.0 by chance? It doesnt boot with acpi enabled (stops in probing ata devices, but it never worked so I think ata is not the only culprit) what can I do with it? would some quirk made the trick? why it worked in 5.3R? thnx for reply roman