From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jul 30 08:14:16 2014
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7908B5C0;
 Wed, 30 Jul 2014 08:14:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A7522A27;
 Wed, 30 Jul 2014 08:14:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.21] (unknown [130.255.19.191])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC90043B8C;
 Wed, 30 Jul 2014 03:13:53 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <53D8A930.3020806@marino.st>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 10:13:36 +0200
From: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st>
Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>, marino@freebsd.org, 
 Max Brazhnikov <makc@freebsd.org>, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r363361 - in head/editors/fte: . files
References: <201407291646.s6TGkjHH090335@svn.freebsd.org>
 <41D25BC1-AC62-4280-A342-8A2BDD84B1E0@adamw.org>
 <20140730070412.GA97692@FreeBSD.org>
 <3898057.T8DsoXnEEp@mercury.ph.man.ac.uk> <53D89EBF.4080805@marino.st>
 <2D24420529C9ECAEABB9A791@atuin.in.mat.cc> <53D8A2BB.7090704@marino.st>
 <6270029E710D3C52B60B6224@atuin.in.mat.cc>
In-Reply-To: <6270029E710D3C52B60B6224@atuin.in.mat.cc>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
 ports-committers@freebsd.org, William Grzybowski <wg@freebsd.org>,
 Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org>
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
 <svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 08:14:16 -0000

On 7/30/2014 10:08, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> 
> 
> +--On 30 juillet 2014 09:46:03 +0200 John Marino
> <freebsd.contact@marino.st> wrote:
> | Take a vote. I'd bet the majority of people do not like "__" not just
> | "someone".
> 
> But, I think you're missing the point, who cares what the separator is ?

All the people that don't use makepatch because it makes stupid patch
names care (or any other reason they don't use makepatch).

I've actually seen people change good patch names to these bad patch
names so it would match makepatch convention.  That's insane, so a
reason to care.

> All it needs to do is work when I run make patch. Also, all one needs to
> know is that to generate the patches, you run make makepatch.

You can't assume the everyone or even the majority of people use
makepatch (thankfully this is not the case).

We obviously care.  I care enough that I'm considering going through the
bureaucratic hassle of getting a patch name convention outlined in
documentation thus forcing a change to tools like makepatch.  Danfe@
obviously cares enough about his eyesight to want it changed.

It really does suck.

John