From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Jul 14 3:20:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C272D37B76F; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 03:20:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA97766; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 12:20:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) To: Adrian Chadd Cc: Matthew Dillon , Andrzej Bialecki , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SysctlFS References: <20000712144510.A11316@ywing.creative.net.au> <200007130537.WAA29614@apollo.backplane.com> <20000714112117.D17372@ywing.creative.net.au> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 14 Jul 2000 12:20:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: Adrian Chadd's message of "Fri, 14 Jul 2000 11:21:17 +0200" Message-ID: Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Adrian Chadd writes: > Oh, I agree. Hence why I said I'd write it up as an "example filesystem" .. > I'm tossing up a few candidates at the moment. Well, how about writing an exampl devfs? ;) I'm only half joking. Everyone seems to agree that we want (and need) devfs, but nobody seems to want to actually write it (yes, I know about the ownership / permissions problem, but don't you think someone would have solved it by now if they really wanted to?) DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message