From owner-cvs-all Tue Sep 19 10:10:49 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from hub.lovett.com (hub.lovett.com [216.60.121.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495FE37B423; Tue, 19 Sep 2000 10:10:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ade by hub.lovett.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 13bQui-000DW9-00; Tue, 19 Sep 2000 12:10:36 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 12:10:36 -0500 From: Ade Lovett To: Warner Losh Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11 Makefile ports/x11/wrapper Makefile ports/x11/wrapper/files md5 ports/x11/wrapper/pkg COMMENT DEINSTALL DESCR PLIST Message-ID: <20000919121036.E51091@FreeBSD.org> References: <200009191645.JAA96634@freefall.freebsd.org> <200009191700.LAA39460@harmony.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200009191700.LAA39460@harmony.village.org>; from imp@village.org on Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 11:00:20AM -0600 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 11:00:20AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > XFree86 desided it was no longer needed, but history since the release > of 4.0 has shown otherwise. This used to be part of X called > Xwrapper. This restores this functionality, no? My understanding that the Xwrapper functionality provided as part of XFree86 3.x does not work with XFree86 4.x, and as such this new port is required until 4.x becomes secure-out-of-the-box again, and you run a multi-user system where you don't necessarily trust your local users to be nice to each other. -aDe -- Ade Lovett, Austin, TX. ade@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message