From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 14 04:36:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD8216A4CF for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 04:36:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailgate.ru (mars.netlogic.ru [81.19.72.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 127AD43D1D for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 04:36:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from 479001601@mail.ru) Received: (qmail 29009 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2004 12:36:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO telefen) (213.33.246.188) by mailgate.ru with SMTP; 14 Mar 2004 12:36:21 -0000 X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.31, engine: 4.31, virus records: 46165, updated: 15.02.2004] From: "CBuH." <479001601@mail.ru> Organization: -+=- To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:37:22 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: clearsigned data Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200403141537.23143.479001601@mail.ru> Subject: packages system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: 479001601@mail.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 12:36:29 -0000 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello again, all. Consider a bad package management system... or .. I don't know! 1) Why, if the package P depends on A-1.2.3 and I manually `pkg_add=20 A-1.2.3_1`, the package P still look for A-1.2.3 and don't want to install? Suppose version of A-1.2.3_X includes the minor patches to version 1.2.3. S= o=20 why such an issue is held? 2) Why If I have pkg_add-ed packages C-1.2.3 and C-1.2.4 and later hoped to= =20 pkg_update C-1.2.4 ....... it found dis-MD5'n in +CONTENTS's files (I=20 understand why) but deletes any way them and C-1.2.3, then pkg_add (in=20 script) C-1.2.4,... but _does_not_ resign +REQUIRED_BY file for C-1.2.4 fro= m=20 C-1.2.3 and does not resample their (pkgs from +REQUIRED_BY) +REQUIRES file= s? Or I have wrong seeing of the packages world? Direct me right. Sorry for *may be* strong speach. =2D --=20 CBuH. CG[CX] XVyGYjau 479001600(at)mail.ru, ICQ#70929413 GnuPG(PGP) public key is: http://www.vinnied.narod.ru/pubkey.asc http://www.vinnied.narod.ru =09 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAVFID5Cj3gqxcdCoRAq4LAKCCAgmm0Lmotaj64rom8Ixc+OneaQCeNydp UK5PRWnItueF/w5Bv5D3RTc=3D =3DtRvP =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----