From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Jun  5 21:40:25 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id VAA26605
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 5 Jun 1995 21:40:25 -0700
Received: from genesis.tiac.net (genesis.tiac.net [204.180.76.1])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id VAA26597
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 5 Jun 1995 21:40:22 -0700
Received: by genesis.tiac.net (8.6.9/genesis0.0)
	id AAA25972; Tue, 6 Jun 1995 00:40:18 -0400
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 1995 00:40:18 -0400
From: steve2@genesis.tiac.net (Steve Gerakines)
Message-Id: <199506060440.AAA25972@genesis.tiac.net>
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kernel page fault while doing tar to /dev/rft0
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> > >Fails my visial, this patch has been rejected for inclusion at this
> > >point in time :-(.
> > 
> > Patches should be reviewed by someone (if any :-) who is familiar with
> > the code.
> 
> Agreed, but it still fails on the fact the hunk is offset which means
> the purson is not testing against -current code.

Again, I could've retrieved -current fd.c and made the same patch in
about 2 minutes (still can if you want), but since it's only one line
moving I didn't bother.  I was only trying to demonstrate what the
offending line was.  I'll speak in pseudo-patch next time, or perhaps
say nothing since I'm apparently unqualified to contribute anything
unless -current is on my machine anyhow.

I'm not trying to break a release that's halfway out the door, just trying
to point out where I think the problem is so someone on the inside can
fix it.

- Steve
steve2@genesis.tiac.net