From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Oct 23 06:07:01 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6DEA16A4CE
	for <net@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 06:07:01 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from hotmail.com (bay24-f14.bay24.hotmail.com [64.4.18.64])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A124943D46
	for <net@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 06:07:01 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from segr@hotmail.com)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
	 Fri, 22 Oct 2004 23:07:01 -0700
Received: from 66.244.239.179 by by24fd.bay24.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
	Sat, 23 Oct 2004 06:06:01 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [66.244.239.179]
X-Originating-Email: [segr@hotmail.com]
X-Sender: segr@hotmail.com
From: "Stephane Raimbault" <segr@hotmail.com>
To: is@rambler-co.ru
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 00:06:01 -0600
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <BAY24-F14rxUn3AkTR60000e03a@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Oct 2004 06:07:01.0152 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[82D92200:01C4B8C6]
cc: net@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Error 49, socket problem?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 06:07:01 -0000

Thanks Igor,

I was running out of ports in the 1024-5000 range and setting my last port 
to 65535 via sysctl did solve my problem.

In 4.10 what will sysctl -w net.inet.ip.portrange.randomized=0 do for me?


Is there any danger of me setting the port range from 1024 - 65535 ?


Thanks,
Stephane.


Igor Sysoev wrote:
>On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Stephane Raimbault wrote:
>
>
>>The servers are busier today and error 49 is comming up frequently now.
>
>
>What does "netstat -n | grep 127.0.0.1 | wc -l" show ?
>
>You should probably try
>
>sysctl -w net.inet.ip.portrange.first=49152
>sysctl -w net.inet.ip.portrange.last=65535
>
>or even
>
>sysctl -w net.inet.ip.portrange.first=1024
>sysctl -w net.inet.ip.portrange.last=65535
>
>And after you upgrade to 4.10 do not forget to set
>
>sysctl -w net.inet.ip.portrange.randomized=0
>
>
>Igor Sysoev
>http://sysoev.ru/en/
>_______________________________________________
>freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

_________________________________________________________________
Take advantage of powerful junk e-mail filters built on patented Microsoft® 
SmartScreen Technology. 
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines 
  Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN® Premium right now and get the 
first two months FREE*.