From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Feb  1 11: 0:44 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.rz.uni-ulm.de (gemini.rz.uni-ulm.de [134.60.246.16])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A5B9037B400; Fri,  1 Feb 2002 11:00:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lilith (lilith.wh-wurm.uni-ulm.de [134.60.106.64])
	by mail.rz.uni-ulm.de (8.12.1/8.12.1) with SMTP id g11J0Wtn008953;
	Fri, 1 Feb 2002 20:00:32 +0100 (MET)
Message-ID: <006a01c1ab52$c827bd00$4011a8c0@whwurm.uniulm.de>
From: "Siegbert Baude" <Siegbert.Baude@gmx.de>
To: <current@freebsd.org>, "Paul Fardy" <pdfardy@mac.com>
Cc: <stable@freebsd.org>
References: <5F46C986-16DB-11D6-8CEC-00039359034A@mac.com>
Subject: Re: *_enable="YES" behavior is bogus
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 20:00:56 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hi all,

> But I think that the intent in /etc/rc.conf is that enable="NO"
> _is_ the same thing as disabling it. You might say "If that were
> the intent, they'd have used _______." What word should we use
> to  indicate the absolute YES or NO that some of us believe
> should be the simple correct interpretation?

I would suggest "foo_functionality". That is very clear, (albeit a bit long
*g*).


Ciao
Siegbert


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message