From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Sat Sep 1 08:37:23 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE8DFD411A; Sat, 1 Sep 2018 08:37:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9229C80772; Sat, 1 Sep 2018 08:37:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from atuin.in.mat.cc (unknown [IPv6:2a01:678:42:ffff:3e15:c2ff:fec4:452e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: mat/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD1A6DED6; Sat, 1 Sep 2018 08:37:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2018 10:37:19 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Jan Beich Cc: Adam Weinberger , svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r478608 - head/devel/msgpack Message-ID: <20180901083719.y6ax7ntnr4mskb6q@atuin.in.mat.cc> References: <201808312014.w7VKEwAC012418@repo.freebsd.org> <4lfa-19se-wny@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dt2ki2uzky74jkep" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4lfa-19se-wny@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2018 08:37:23 -0000 --dt2ki2uzky74jkep Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 11:54:57PM +0200, Jan Beich wrote: > Adam Weinberger writes: > > Please back this out. >=20 > OK but TEST_DEPENDS will go away. If you don't bother to learn how > testing framework[1] works there's no benefit to keep the cruft aka the > remnants of the work you've trampled on via maintainer timeout. You committed to a port without asking the maintainer, or submitting a PR and waiting for a maintainer timeout. The maintainer asked you to back your changes out. The correct way to handle this is not argue that whatever, because nobody is interested of why you broke our rules, or think you know better, or whatever, again. No, really, nobody. The correct way is to say "ok", maybe adding an apology for acting out of turn, and to apply the exact reversed patch and commit it, maybe adding another PORTREVISION bump if your patch added one. --=20 Mathieu Arnold --dt2ki2uzky74jkep Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAABCgB9FiEEOraXidLtEhBkQLpbOkUW81GDzkgFAluKT75fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNB QjY5Nzg5RDJFRDEyMTA2NDQwQkE1QjNBNDUxNkYzNTE4M0NFNDgACgkQOkUW81GD zkgRDQ//TogMD/TeakLbQUkh+WniSMwUPBGPQ4QkdEBJyf4rg6mszwYITGurAjez roMXT0bNQitwV6IkSN/MW5RPmM9unVe6ISYkgLL4WitlR3v62u/vCGB24xkBQu0F 2uMqTbIO6W4ivl7GU8GVLeeMsGSVA6yfswRkyMYuvzdNmeNtE4Qmh458rhx8aHMK weQsGgg96XtdLtqtUnRaQqdCUtYHBqm8UKEOgky3TWzGIJTwPX+8eTTHuaYnA23W W55FVfm5oob46SEJcDDa4uOAP7HBgj03GxtpINtUQfUIm/tBi4h7J0xoEdfzs3/q E9jlUtdvc8OTH2nFNu/ARFbNnCtvGJUAYidd00MSokNE+4tRDllPSuukbCIyGPjX fEhSQqKyQZrqWipyNly9vfwtRS8Qda7r2vqi1PCiXYtf4eTkgfyu2CCQgXkYG6vI ejlp5l0YZUUqInGkorqgqMRzB3tHV5gXlawu9Z2gXx9g9EXTQ2zmXc8saM/3ETeA VET87HMX9BZ4sR3H8xoEHsxttNekgH71yN86UyGywqFXoh12pH4v7bTtal65J1HY v5b5MzQEL+RUl/LO9TifXddKHB1IGTgWp/cAuKySnT1GLD1PcLahsLFIayMOAYNB u7EpcgpAcTNIYK0vnvUQMxR5Glo5kvP60FgqfYLg2+vvWtqZi7A= =F/cA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dt2ki2uzky74jkep--