From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 20 12:40:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mgate10.so-net.ne.jp (mgate10.so-net.ne.jp [210.139.254.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5644D37B71C for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 12:40:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ipfw@ya3.so-net.ne.jp) Received: from mail.ya3.so-net.ne.jp (mspool11.so-net.ne.jp [210.139.248.11]) by mgate10.so-net.ne.jp (8.9.3/3.7W01031514) with ESMTP id FAA13747; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 05:38:25 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (pee7aa7.kngwnt01.ap.so-net.ne.jp [202.238.122.167]) by mail.ya3.so-net.ne.jp (8.9.3/3.7W01022316) with ESMTP id FAA23034; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 05:38:24 +0900 (JST) To: kris@obsecurity.org Cc: Yoshihiro.Koya@math.yokohama-cu.ac.jp, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CPUTYPE flag of 4.3-BETA From: Yoshihiro Koya In-Reply-To: <20010320121726.B23970@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20010321050330K.koya@pluto.math.yokohama-cu.ac.jp> <20010320121726.B23970@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.1 on Emacs 19.34 / Mule 2.3 (SUETSUMUHANA) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010321054522A.ipfw@ya3.so-net.ne.jp> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 05:45:22 +0900 X-Dispatcher: imput version 990905(IM130) Lines: 26 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thanks for your immediate reply. From: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: CPUTYPE flag of 4.3-BETA Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 12:17:26 -0800 Message-ID: <20010320121726.B23970@xor.obsecurity.org> > On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 05:03:30AM +0900, Yoshihiro Koya wrote: > > > Is it correct behavior of the standard make world/buildkernel on 4.3-BETA? > > Or, does something go wrong? > > CPUTYPE isn't currently used for building the kernel on 4.x. I've > patched it to do so on -current, but haven't merged the changes. I can understand that CPUTYPE isn't used for building the kernel on 4-stable. Thanks. But, I have still a question. The compilation of the kernel itself is free from the effects of CPUTYPE, but the kernel modules may be compiled with -march=SOMECPU as I repoted in my previous message. It seems to cause some inconsistency in the future, I guess. Is my thought wrong? koya To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message