From owner-freebsd-questions  Tue Jul 29 09:04:40 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA25342
          for questions-outgoing; Tue, 29 Jul 1997 09:04:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from super-g.inch.com (super-g.com [207.240.140.161])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA25321
          for <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 29 Jul 1997 09:04:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (spork@localhost)
	by super-g.inch.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA03859;
	Tue, 29 Jul 1997 12:05:38 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 1997 12:05:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: spork <spork@super-g.com>
X-Sender: spork@super-g.inch.com
To: David Greenman <dg@root.com>
cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: de0 problem 2.2-STABLE 
In-Reply-To: <199707290051.RAA28967@implode.root.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970729120342.3845A-100000@super-g.inch.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Another little thing I saw while looking at the source, I don't know
enough here to say what this would do, but at line 1370 there is a
spurious "^L".  I assume it's just a coincidence that this is part of the
section where it determines if the link is dead and downs the if...

   sc->tulip_probe_state = TULIP_PROBE_INACTIVE;
    tulip_21140_autonegotiate(sc, phy);
}
^L
static void
tulip_21140_nomii_media_preset(
    tulip_softc_t * const sc)

I'll take it out and recompile for fun as soon as my make world is done...

Charles

On Mon, 28 Jul 1997, David Greenman wrote:

> >I tried the Intel cards as well, but found that they had changed the rev
> >on them since DG put one in wcarchive.  What is the preferred PCI 10/100
> >card these days?
> 
>    All versions of the PCI Pro/100B should work fine in 2.2-stable. If there
> is a version that doesn't, I want to know about it.
> 
> -DG
> 
> David Greenman
> Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project
>