From owner-freebsd-security Thu Dec 21 3:47: 9 2000 From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 21 03:47:07 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E73437B400 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 03:47:06 -0800 (PST) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA12379; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 12:47:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Sender: des@ofug.org X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Roger Marquis Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: dsniff 2.3 info: References: From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 21 Dec 2000 12:47:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: Roger Marquis's message of "Wed, 20 Dec 2000 19:32:44 -0800 (PST)" Message-ID: Lines: 9 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Roger Marquis writes: > Bad administrators? You must be joking. [it's FreeBSD's fault...] We are eagerly anticipating patches that address the issues you mention. You do have patches, don't you? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message