From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org  Tue Dec  6 10:04:45 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D4FAC69683;
 Tue,  6 Dec 2016 10:04:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org)
Received: from mail.turbocat.net (mail.turbocat.net
 [IPv6:2a01:4f8:d16:4514::2])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2154E1D26;
 Tue,  6 Dec 2016 10:04:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org)
Received: from hps2016.home.selasky.org (unknown [62.141.129.119])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B5B311FE158;
 Tue,  6 Dec 2016 11:04:41 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: Optimising generated rules for SAT solving (5/12 are duplicates)
To: Vsevolod Stakhov <vsevolod@highsecure.ru>, Ed Schouten <ed@nuxi.nl>
References: <20150414200459.GE39658@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
 <20150421103454.GR1394@zxy.spb.ru> <5593D0AE.2010205@selasky.org>
 <416359ce-1dcd-1160-5c56-f120a0f6358f@selasky.org>
 <20160627115533.gqvdsmtzwnvrrfuo@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
 <0671148b-d7cd-f8ad-906d-a0baa1b98cf5@selasky.org>
 <cbc964a7-5f90-6ea1-630d-414de68867b1@selasky.org>
 <CABh_MKm7LAtQzp9KEBpaRZWQQHnsUtNFiKVSVF70-wj4GmytuA@mail.gmail.com>
 <d786cde5-89af-cb14-c42e-cc649cb32bdb@highsecure.ru>
 <9b0469bb-ab2b-4992-1d40-de748163f2c8@selasky.org>
 <8c5cb2ea-54ab-c91b-5859-b6a73a2a7005@highsecure.ru>
 <6a81db90-40fa-ec5f-9402-333091c333f2@selasky.org>
Cc: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>, Slawa Olhovchenkov
 <slw@zxy.spb.ru>, ports@freebsd.org,
 FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
From: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org>
Message-ID: <278d487d-4752-5fa6-6037-2e157db100c2@selasky.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 11:04:16 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6a81db90-40fa-ec5f-9402-333091c333f2@selasky.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 10:04:45 -0000

On 11/24/16 14:11, Vsevolod Stakhov wrote:
>
> Then I don't understand how your patch should affect the solving
> procedure. If pkg tries to reinstall something without *reason* it is a
> good sign of bug in pkg itself and/or your database/repo and not in SAT
> solver.
>
> I'll try to review your issue but I'll likely need your local packages
> database for this test.

Hi Vsevolod,

Did you have a chance to look at this?

--HPS