From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 20 21:42:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B5916A4CE; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:42:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.broadpark.no (mail.broadpark.no [217.13.4.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7C0443D55; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:42:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from dwp.des.no (37.80-203-228.nextgentel.com [80.203.228.37]) by mail.broadpark.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 486183013; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 23:42:58 +0200 (MEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 2BD83B85E; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 23:42:17 +0200 (CEST) To: "M. Warner Losh" References: <20040920140744.163da930@localhost> <20040920181903.GB95778@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040920182901.GA40865@madman.celabo.org> <20040920.145403.37240640.imp@bsdimp.com> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 23:42:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20040920.145403.37240640.imp@bsdimp.com> (M. Warner Losh's message of "Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:54:03 -0600 (MDT)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: trhodes@freebsd.org cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: nectar@freebsd.org cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org cc: obrien@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/bind9 - Imported sources X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:42:22 -0000 "M. Warner Losh" writes: > "Jacques A. Vidrine" writes: > : Out of the 1,189 BIND 8 files and 2,100 BIND 9 files, there are only 8 > : files that are in the same place. It would cause a confusing mess to > : import this over src/contrib/bind and it would offer no benefit that I > : can see. > That, however, is a decent reason. Thanks. You should have just said > that in the first place, rather than be argumentative with David. I am sorry that "they are two completely different code bases" was not clear enough. Please send me a copy of the dictionary you use so that I may know in the future which words you understand and which you don't. DES *mightily p***ed off* --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no