From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 20:12:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B212216A4CE for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:12:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (cpe.atm2-0-53484.0x50a6c9a6.abnxx9.customer.tele.dk [80.166.201.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0018043D60 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:12:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sos@DeepCore.dk) Received: from [194.192.25.143] (laptop.deepcore.dk [194.192.25.143]) by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j11KC4dF032694; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 21:12:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sos@DeepCore.dk) Message-ID: <41FFE288.3090804@DeepCore.dk> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 21:11:52 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dmitry Pryanishnikov References: <41FF6934.9040300@atlantis.dp.ua> <20050201133646.E59974@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> In-Reply-To: <20050201133646.E59974@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-mail-scanned: by DeepCore Virus & Spam killer v1.6 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What about ITE8212F (Was: Re: Silicon Image SiI 3112 Serial ATA) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 20:12:12 -0000 Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: >=20 > Hello! >=20 >> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 08:26:56 +0100 >> From: =3D?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=3DF8ren_Schmidt?=3D >> >>> =3D20 >>> OK, I'm just looking at AMD boards. ICH5 obviously doesn't go on >>> any of those. Unfortunately only a few high-end opteron boards >>> ship with something other than SiI3112. :( >> >> >> As they say, you get what you pay for :) >> >=20 > What's your opinion about ITE8212F-based ATA controllers? When code=20 > that supports those controllers should reach RELENG_5? There are no=20 > Promise cards > available in our area, but I can buy ITE8212F ones. My primary usage=20 > will be > just plain ATA channels (I don't plan to use RAID functionality yet). Well, I dont have too much experience with it since I just got the HW=20 about a month ago but its worked flawlessly since in daily use in my WS. If you want 5.x support just grap the ATA driver form -current minus the = atapi*.? stuff and its will do the trick. -S=F8ren