From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 15:33:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A05016A405; Wed, 16 May 2007 15:33:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from redbull.bpaserver.net (redbullneu.bpaserver.net [213.198.78.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D2513C48A; Wed, 16 May 2007 15:33:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (p54A5FC6A.dip.t-dialin.net [84.165.252.106]) by redbull.bpaserver.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D4B52E237; Wed, 16 May 2007 17:33:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from deskjail (deskjail.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.109]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8EFC5B48A3; Wed, 16 May 2007 17:32:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 17:33:11 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?UTF-8?B?U23DuHJncmF2?=) Message-ID: <20070516173311.6efe4f6a@deskjail> In-Reply-To: <867ir8kidz.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <200705160846.l4G8kaYr074481@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070516124002.6g6ox6y28048ws4g@webmail.leidinger.net> <867ir8kidz.fsf@dwp.des.no> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BPAnet-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-BPAnet-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-BPAnet-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-14.564, required 8, BAYES_00 -15.00, DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME 0.00, FORGED_RCVD_HELO 0.14, MIME_8BIT_HEADER 0.30) X-BPAnet-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-Spam-Status: No Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile Makefile.inc1 X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 15:33:19 -0000 Quoting des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav) (Wed, 16 May 2007 15:28:08 +0= 200): > Alexander Leidinger writes: > > For the check-old target there's no reason to split up the targets, as > > you can list them unconditionally. For developing convenience I did > > chose to have the check-old-XXX targets in Makefile.inc1 ("make -f > > Makefile.inc1 TARGET" works just fine). I see no need to expose all > > targets. >=20 > I see no reason not to. The fact that they were not all exposed has > always confused me, I don't know how many times I've done 'make > check-old-libs' and been annoyed that it didn't work. Not all targets in Makefile.inc1 are exposed, so why not make them all available... Bye, Alexander. --=20 Hold the MAYO & pass the COSMIC AWARENESS ... http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137