From owner-freebsd-current Mon Mar 6 20:27:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B16A737BDA7 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2000 20:27:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA57041; Mon, 6 Mar 2000 21:27:32 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id VAA91186; Mon, 6 Mar 2000 21:27:22 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200003070427.VAA91186@harmony.village.org> To: Doug Ambrisko Subject: Re: /usr/bin/ssh and SOCKS Cc: "James E. Pace" , current@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 06 Mar 2000 16:30:06 PST." <200003070030.QAA75449@whistle.com> References: <200003070030.QAA75449@whistle.com> Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 21:27:22 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200003070030.QAA75449@whistle.com> Doug Ambrisko writes: : Another alternative is to remove the setuid bits /usr/bin/ssh and : then do a "runsocks ssh". That's not really an option for my work patterns... : I could do the work if deemed usefull. I don't want to maintain : my own branch and we use the Nec implementation here so I don't : want to be bouncing between them for no good reason. I'd be up for that as well. Anything that works. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message