From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu May 11 18: 9:21 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from smtp13.bellglobal.com (smtp13.bellglobal.com [204.101.251.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9194D37BC6F for ; Thu, 11 May 2000 18:09:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hoek@FreeBSD.org) Received: from Hamilton-ppp44812.sympatico.ca (ppp1617.on.bellglobal.com [206.172.249.81]) by smtp13.bellglobal.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA11354; Thu, 11 May 2000 21:12:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from tim@localhost) by Hamilton-ppp44812.sympatico.ca (8.9.3/8.9.1) id VAA38544; Thu, 11 May 2000 21:09:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tim) Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 21:09:15 -0400 From: Tim Vanderhoek To: Garance A Drosihn Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Looking for advice on lpr/lpd changes Message-ID: <20000511210915.A38341@Hamilton-ppp44812.sympatico.ca> References: <20000510121459.B4589@Hamilton-ppp44812.sympatico.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i In-Reply-To: ; from Garance A Drosihn on Thu, May 11, 2000 at 04:43:25PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 04:43:25PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > > Hmm. I always assumed that was for "big freebsd architectural > changes", as opposed to changes to a "little program" like lpr. I'd rather see a discussion about designing new features for lpr on -arch than I would see a discussion on, say, I dunno, maybe renaming all .s files to .S. > I have already noticed that send-pr patches are sometimes > committed almost instantly, and other times it's like pulling > teeth to get some attention for them... Don't feeling too guilty about politely knocking -committers over the head once-in-a-while. Just before weekends is probably a good time. ;-) -- Signature withheld by request of author. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message