From owner-cvs-libexec  Tue Sep  2 07:10:36 1997
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-libexec>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id HAA07949
          for cvs-libexec-outgoing; Tue, 2 Sep 1997 07:10:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from access.sfc.wide.ad.jp (bourbon.sfc.wide.ad.jp [203.178.139.171])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA07936;
          Tue, 2 Sep 1997 07:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bourbon.sfc.wide.ad.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by access.sfc.wide.ad.jp (8.8.7/3.5Wpl107/15/97) with ESMTP id XAA12185; Tue, 2 Sep 1997 23:09:33 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <199709021409.XAA12185@access.sfc.wide.ad.jp>
To: andreas@klemm.gtn.com
Cc: max@wide.ad.jp, davidn@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG,
        cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-libexec@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/libexec/getty chat.c subr.c
From: Masafumi NAKANE/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQ2Y6LDJtSjgbKEI=?= <max@wide.ad.jp>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 2 Sep 1997 13:24:01 +0200"
References: <19970902132401.18756@klemm.gtn.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.70 on Emacs 19.28.1 / Mule 2.3
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 00 D8 2C CA C7 75 D4 40  5C 34 39 BA A5 46 C0 CC
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 1997 23:09:33 +0900
Sender: owner-cvs-libexec@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

     > BTW, any reason, why this code went into RELENG_2_2 in a hurry
     > about 2 minutes later with zero testing ? ;-)

This reminds me that I've been getting this feeling that some
committers are making changes to RELENG_2_2 too soon.  IMO, except for
things like spelling correction, we should wait for awhile, maybe a
day or two, before bringing changes into the stable branch.  

Max