From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 20 09:15:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1677E16A41C for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:15:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from V.Konrad@lse.ac.uk) Received: from exic6.lse.ac.uk (exic6.lse.ac.uk [158.143.216.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF4943D58 for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:15:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from V.Konrad@lse.ac.uk) Received: from ExF1.lse.ac.uk ([158.143.216.11]) by exic6.lse.ac.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:15:15 +0100 Received: EXF1.lse.ac.uk 158.143.216.11 from 158.143.116.174 158.143.116.174 via HTTP with MS-WebStorage 6.0.6249 Received: from whirpool.lse.ac.uk by EXF1.lse.ac.uk; 20 Jun 2005 10:17:33 +0100 From: Vladimir Konrad To: Luciano Musacchio In-Reply-To: <200506180001.58732.l0kit0@exactas.org> References: <200506180001.58732.l0kit0@exactas.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:17:33 +0100 Message-Id: <1119259053.85464.2.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Jun 2005 09:15:15.0296 (UTC) FILETIME=[91D2BE00:01C57578] Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: postfix or qmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:15:17 -0000 > hi, > I've a simple question, postfix or qmail? :), I've a fair review for both from > some linux admins, now, I want to know fbsd's community opinion :). The mail > server (now running sendmail) serves ~300 accounts. I have very good experience with Postfix + Courier IMAP combination. I went for Postfix because it is actively developed... > Other thing (perhaps, the one that I interest more your opinion), do anyone > know why MacOS X Server is using postfix instead of qmail? (i mean, the > latter is far more popular, right?), Not sure. Both are simmilar design in principle (multiple daemons). Vlad