From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jan 9 15:49: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from jason01.u.washington.edu (jason01.u.washington.edu [140.142.70.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BC8F14CB3 for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2000 15:48:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eroubinc@u.washington.edu) Received: from dante24.u.washington.edu (eroubinc@dante24.u.washington.edu [140.142.15.74]) by jason01.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id PAA29794; Sun, 9 Jan 2000 15:48:49 -0800 Received: from localhost (eroubinc@localhost) by dante24.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id PAA27638; Sun, 9 Jan 2000 15:48:48 -0800 Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2000 15:48:48 -0800 (PST) From: Evgeny Roubinchtein To: Mike Harding Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: When does the 4.x branch go stable? In-Reply-To: <20000109214046.7913BA54DB@netcom1.netcom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 9 Jan 2000, Mike Harding wrote: > >I'm interested in picking up the new gcc, but I was just curious as to >when the 4.x branch becomes -STABLE, since the release is just around >the corner. Also, that would be 4.x -STABLE, right? This is perhaps tangential, but if you wish to use gcc-2.95.2 for your projects, why not install the "egcs" port (it's actually gcc-2.95.2)? -- Evgeny The computing field is always in need of new cliches. - Alan Perlis To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message