From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 19 12:20:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9155106566B for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:20:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@gmx.com) Received: from mailout-eu.gmx.com (mailout-eu.gmx.com [213.165.64.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 40FA18FC0C for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:20:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2011 12:20:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [192.168.73.192]) [79.107.186.205] by mail.gmx.com (mp-eu001) with SMTP; 19 Jul 2011 14:20:14 +0200 X-Authenticated: #46156728 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18L9ig49XYLRkh5l661WcvPBOtFvqPYMTRxQ7E08f 06qL3DGPVHwwHO Message-ID: <4E257671.1080901@gmx.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:20:01 +0300 From: Nikos Vassiliadis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hans Petter Selasky References: <4E256BC3.9000500@gmx.com> <201107191334.56281.hselasky@c2i.net> <4E256D4C.10707@gmx.com> <201107191348.10280.hselasky@c2i.net> In-Reply-To: <201107191348.10280.hselasky@c2i.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x051d product 0x0002 bus uhub0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:20:17 -0000 On 7/19/2011 2:48 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > Have you tried 8-stable? I think this issue has been mentioned earlier at this > list. Try searching the archives. I did see some references but no solution. I cannot try 8-STABLE at the moment but I'll report back when I'll update it. > Also try looking at devd which might give > some clues. Aha, that was devd logging! It was not that obvious that devd was creating the logging messages! Perhaps it should prepend its name to the log? Thanks a lot HPS! Nikos