From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Dec 2 12:50:57 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA03293 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Wed, 2 Dec 1998 12:50:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA03287 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 1998 12:50:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA08704; Wed, 2 Dec 1998 12:52:01 -0800 (PST) To: Andreas Klemm cc: Eivind Eklund , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Can we just come to a decision on IPv6 and IPSec? In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 02 Dec 1998 17:28:24 +0100." <19981202172824.A23747@klemm.gtn.com> Date: Wed, 02 Dec 1998 12:52:01 -0800 Message-ID: <8701.912631921@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > The offer -STABLE source and -CURRENT Snaps. > Things they are working on is: > > - IPv6 > - IPsec > - advanced packet queuing, ATM, mobility,.... One has to ask the obvious question, however: The existing IPSec stuff that's been submitted for commit approval is fully functional and currently in use at several sites in Europe. If we went to the KAME stuff right now, today, would we be able to offer these users the same degree of functionality or would KAME represent a "loss" from their perspective? - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message