Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 17 Oct 2019 16:45:14 +0700
From:      Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>
To:        Daniel Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>, FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: 12.1 weirdness
Message-ID:  <60ee7253-d49b-19d1-6193-ab9f7ac22a8c@grosbein.net>
In-Reply-To: <2AE097DF-E7CA-4A02-B57E-2A490DBC40EC@cs.huji.ac.il>
References:  <2AE097DF-E7CA-4A02-B57E-2A490DBC40EC@cs.huji.ac.il>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
17.10.2019 12:37, Daniel Braniss wrote:

> just trying out 12,1 on a DELL PowerEdge R710, and I see:
> ...
> Oct 16 22:52:12 store-08 kernel: bce3: bce_pulse(): Warning: bootcode thinks driver is absent! (bc_state = 0x0023600E)
> Oct 16 22:52:13 store-08 kernel: Limiting icmp unreach response from 3244 to 200 packets/sec
> Oct 16 22:52:13 store-08 kernel: bce3: bce_pulse(): Bootcode found the driver pulse! (bc_state = 0x0003610E)
> Oct 17 06:04:29 store-08 kernel: Limiting icmp unreach response from 564 to 200 packets/sec
> 
> there is nothing connected to bce3, only bce0, 
> rev is r353486, and it’s diskless.

Does it experience some disruption? If not, you may just ignore those.

> BTW: is there a way of knowing which port is being reported as unreachable? 

So many packets should be easily seen with net/trafshow or just tcpdump.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?60ee7253-d49b-19d1-6193-ab9f7ac22a8c>