From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Jan 12 22:03:04 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id WAA26734 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 12 Jan 1995 22:03:04 -0800
Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (root@UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id WAA26728 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 1995 22:02:56 -0800
Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA09765
  (5.67a/IDA-1.5); Thu, 12 Jan 1995 23:41:32 -0600
Received: by bonkers.taronga.com (smail2.5p) id AA00730; 12 Jan 95 22:20:05 CST (Thu)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) with SMTP id WAA00727; Thu, 12 Jan 1995 22:20:04 -0600
Message-Id: <199501130420.WAA00727@bonkers.taronga.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: bonkers.taronga.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
To: "Andrew A. Chernov, Black Mage" <ache@astral.msk.su>
Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, wpaul@skynet.ctr.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: Small syscons change 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 13 Jan 95 06:36:29 +0300."
             <ATzKV5leS9@astral.msk.su> 
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.4.1 7/21/94
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 1995 22:20:02 -0600
From: Peter da Silva <peter@bonkers.taronga.com>
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> >No kidding. My point is that all the VAX (VMS, I assume) software he
> >was complaining about was likely expecting it.

> And all SCO software don't expect it :-)

Oh no fear, I wouldn't wish VT100 linewrap on my worst enemy.

Well, maybe my worst enemy.