From owner-freebsd-net Wed Mar 5 20:13:34 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D599D37B405 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 20:13:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from web13403.mail.yahoo.com (web13403.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.175.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2B00C43F85 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 20:13:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from giffunip@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20030306041333.7884.qmail@web13403.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.24.79.242] by web13403.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 06 Mar 2003 05:13:33 CET Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 05:13:33 +0100 (CET) From: "=?iso-8859-1?q?Pedro=20F.=20Giffuni?=" Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.x] netns To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Guys; I have to agree with Terry that the fixes for netns should be committed, and furthermore they should be MFC (using his first patch perhaps). It's a nightmare to try to rescue anything from the Attic, at least it would be nice to have it in better shape before killing it. The flame fest on removing it or not can go on ;). cheers, Pedro. ______________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Cellulari: loghi, suonerie, picture message per il tuo telefonino http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/?http://it.mobile.yahoo.com/index2002.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message