From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Nov 5 11:17:05 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA16710 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Thu, 5 Nov 1998 11:17:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (castles232.castles.com [208.214.165.232]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA16695 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 1998 11:17:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (LOCALHOST [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA04119 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 1998 11:16:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199811051916.LAA04119@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: ncurses update? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 11:16:23 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Coming out of a discussion on the -alpha list, I was contacted about this. We're still at 1.8.6. What's the justification for not upgrading? From: dickey@clark.net Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 08:12:42 -0500 (EST) To: mike@smith.net.au Subject: http://x5.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=408607429&CONTEXT=910271281.396886 sounds like someone's confused the terminfo setf/setb for setaf/setab. This is in my faq: The current version of ncurses is 4.2 There's an faq at http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey/ncurses/ncurses.faq.html (report bugs, but the red/blue interchange was fixed more than a year ago). -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message