From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 4 13:14:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90ADA106566C for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 13:14:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from snoop@email.it) Received: from smtp-out06.email.it (smtp-out06.email.it [212.97.34.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B5D48FC0A for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 13:14:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-out06.email.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B2EA2C014 for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 14:14:03 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at email.it Received: from smtp-out06.email.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp-out06.email.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ZtsCj4XZRibY for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 14:14:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.0.0.59] (inhio.eu [84.242.85.251]) by smtp-out06.email.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8620B2C00B for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 14:14:02 +0100 (CET) From: Snoop To: freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: <4EDA9A99.6000508@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <1322934867.86416.1.camel@blackfriar.inhio.eu> <4EDA9A99.6000508@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 14:14:01 +0100 Message-ID: <1323004441.86416.3.camel@blackfriar.inhio.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Jails within different networks ... ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 13:14:05 -0000 I've actually done that but the result was jails coming up incredibly slowly and once up basically not "wired". I'm gonna check my configuration again and I'll update the mailing list soon. Thanks for you time to you all. On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 21:54 +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 03/12/2011 17:54, Snoop wrote: > > I have 3 jails within the host xxx.xxx.26.224 configured in this way > > (below) and everything works well. > > What if I want to enable another jail but I don't want to assign to that > > my next available public ip address xxx.xxx.26.228/24 but I want this > > jail to have a private ip address like 172.16.1.2/27? > > Is that possible or it's a delirium? > > Sure you can do that. Remember the rule though, that the first IP from > each different network configured on an interface must use the natural > netmask for that network. Second and subsequent addresses from each > different network can either use the all-ones (/32) netmask, or the > natural netmask. This only changed a few years ago, so there's still a > lot of advice going around saying you should use the older all-ones > style, but in actuality you can do it which ever of those ways you want > and it won't make any functional difference. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > -- Caselle da 1GB, trasmetti allegati fino a 3GB e in piu' IMAP, POP3 e SMTP autenticato? GRATIS solo con Email.it http://www.email.it/f Sponsor: ING DIRECT Conto Arancio. 4,20% per 12 mesi, zero spese, aprilo in due minuti! Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=11924&d=4-12