From owner-freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org Fri Dec 14 11:09:52 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ruby@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA85132BEB5 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 11:09:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F586B1FB for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 11:09:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5378E132BEB4; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 11:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ruby@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41CC3132BEB3 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 11:09:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D12CF6B1FA for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 11:09:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C2831ED40 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 11:09:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id wBEB9n2I089419 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 11:09:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id wBEB9nBA089417 for ruby@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 11:09:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 234005] www/redmine: Update to 4.0.0 Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 11:09:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 11:09:52 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D234005 --- Comment #3 from Kubilay Kocak --- (In reply to cedric from comment #2) Understood and understandable. I think it would be good to add it to the wiki nonetheless, so I'll do that. Similar to Python, I think the answer to the last question might comprise something like: Use RVM or equivalent/similar virtual environment to install ruby applicati= on stacks above the 'ruby language' (ruby language freebsd package) layer. I w= ould include 'rails' in the definition of application layer. Concretely, that would mean: - Install lang/rubyXX port/package that redmine4 requires - Install postgresql port/package you want. - Use rvm (or equiv) to create per customer/instance virtual environments t= hat install redmine and everything else above that. Alternatively, since you don't require plugins, in particular the ones we h= ave in ports that are probably blockers/required to update the redmine port, you could run a local version of the redmine port, updated to 4.x. I wouldn't g= uess that the port delta to 4.x would be huge. Which makes me think of another option: to create a www/redmine4 port, leav= ing www/redmine as it is (on 3.x) to be deprecated someday. There are plenty of other examples in ports where we have version-suffixed ports of the same software for each major/branch version. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=