From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 19:50:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7734A16A420; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:50:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 105FD43D46; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:50:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F771A3C24; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:50:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D328B525C5; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:50:14 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:50:14 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Mikhail Teterin Message-ID: <20060228195014.GA85269@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <1141151381.20664.19.camel@mteterin.us.murex.com> <20060228192453.GA84695@xor.obsecurity.org> <1141155894.20664.59.camel@mteterin.us.murex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1141155894.20664.59.camel@mteterin.us.murex.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, gnome@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: While we discuss libtool (-fpic vs. -fPIC) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:50:17 -0000 --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:44:54PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > ? ??, 2006-02-28 ? 14:24 -0500, Kris Kennaway ????: > > Not sure what you're requesting precisely, but -fPIC and not -fpic is > > correct on amd64 and ia64. >=20 > I'm requesting, libtool is changed to use `-fpic' instead of `-fPIC' on > all arches except sparc64. This is more efficient, and is what > bsd.lib.mk does: >=20 > .if !defined(PICFLAG) > .if ${MACHINE_ARCH} =3D=3D "sparc64" > PICFLAG=3D-fPIC > .else > PICFLAG=3D-fpic > .endif > .endif >=20 > The performance difference is slight, and is not worth chasing every > shared-library building port. But if we can improve hundreds of ports at > once by correcting libtool, we certainly should. OK, that's wrong then, as above. Kris --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEBKl2Wry0BWjoQKURAmhxAJ9Qeoq0lEcT8H0IJEQVue134dSieACg4YS3 ZkG4KC1PwPAYKMChu98DZ3I= =xTFU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw--