From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jan 17 12:50:37 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from smtp1.cybersurf.net (smtp1.cybersurf.net [209.197.145.111]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CCF61539E for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 12:50:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from 01031149@3web.net) Received: from webserver ([209.197.153.175]) by smtp1.cybersurf.net (Netscape Messaging Server 4.05) with SMTP id FOHZ8000.QLG for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 13:50:24 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 13:51:38 -0700 X-Priority: 3 From: Duke Normandin <01031149@3web.net> X-Mailer: Mail Warrior To: charon@hades.hell.gr, "keramida@ceid.upatras.gr" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Firewall: ipfw or natd Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Mailer-Version: v3.55 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 01/17/2000 6:03:50 AM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >On Sun, Jan 16, 2000 at 06:24:04PM -0700, Duke Normandin wrote: >> >> What criterion (ia) are used for determining the use of ipfw or natd >> in creating a firewall? TIA.. > >You can use both on the same `firewall'. > >They are two different programs, with a different purpose each. > I gathered as much now....thanks! I'm now curious to read the answer to the post with the subject line, "ipf/ipnat vs ipfw/natd", as well as determining whether or not natd's `divert' capabality has (can have) anyhting to do with firewalling. -duke To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message