From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 21:00:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: performance@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2883F16A46F for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:00:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danger@FreeBSD.org) Received: from virtual.micronet.sk (smtp.micronet.sk [84.16.32.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D629D13C46E for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:00:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danger@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by virtual.micronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 223C610E657; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 22:26:31 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at virtual.micronet.sk Received: from virtual.micronet.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (virtual.micronet.sk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UOx5N803RXyd; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 22:26:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.50.0.2] (danger.mcrn.sk [84.16.37.254]) by virtual.micronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC52F10E665; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 22:26:27 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 22:27:47 +0200 From: Daniel Gerzo Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <2410282290.20070614222747@rulez.sk> To: Jeff Roberson In-Reply-To: <20070613133712.C60816@10.0.0.1> References: <20070613133712.C60816@10.0.0.1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Call for testers, amd64 only, new scheduler. (fwd) X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Gerzo List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:00:05 -0000 Hello Jeff, Wednesday, June 13, 2007, 10:37:44 PM, you wrote: > I'm forwarding this email that I sent to current@ in the hopes that some > performance minded people will tell me their results with this new > scheduler infrastructure. Just a quick and maybe silly question: Why does it pefrofms worser than 7.0+contension (don't know what it really means) with a bigger concurrency limit? -- Best regards, Daniel mailto:danger@FreeBSD.org