From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 12 16:22:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF5C616A4CE for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 16:22:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2293543D54 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 16:22:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so1927196wri for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:22:29 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=A+JQd+uSYMuosMAo4CO8sTUlZgRq+hd7kNi/gNAHWVTMEy8x03LOAo5/0kJNgFPIDUEDU0oMz+duZj0v8w0v/ZJwWnmkMFJx10RzvMFYkh3MR2gOjepIw7lt+XiVKKXZIGilXjfXqN0/E4pJQ4VMU868GS7QYhNrm4q9yUcMhng= Received: by 10.54.94.16 with SMTP id r16mr1056130wrb; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:22:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.29.77 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:22:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <790a9fff0504120922217ad444@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:22:28 -0500 From: Scot Hetzel To: Alejandro Pulver In-Reply-To: <20050411203859.33d6c45f@ale.varnet.bsd> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050411175526.54ffd260@ale.varnet.bsd> <20050411211923.GA9149@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050411184818.494ac35e@ale.varnet.bsd> <20050412005541.58ea5f0c@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> <1113260537.89967.48.camel@cream.xbsd.org> <20050411203859.33d6c45f@ale.varnet.bsd> cc: Ion-Mihai Tetcu cc: Kris Kennaway cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org cc: Florent Thoumie Subject: Re: Creating port with options X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Scot Hetzel List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 16:22:30 -0000 On Apr 11, 2005 6:38 PM, Alejandro Pulver wrote: > Wich is the best way to manage conflictive options inside the OPTIONS > variable? > That should be work, but it may store the bad option in the options file. They'll just have to do a make reconfig to correct it. If you could split the port into 3 seperate ports: *-server *-x11-client *-ncurses-client Then you wouldn't need to worry about using the OPTIONS variable. This way you could make the *-client ports depend on the *-server port. Scot