From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 12 10:14:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19D3191 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 10:14:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-x232.google.com (mail-ig0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9C0F1063 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 10:14:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com) Received: by igbzc4 with SMTP id zc4so8731946igb.0 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 03:14:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=R+teiUQvfCcMK+N7hTOPEn8bMYFwrnTh1OVkIZhFg0k=; b=FPOYiiciPKA/BrdYTYJOxto1qoMk5n5WqJ8KcAY+Gb7mde/TAguFCRkYQYLwwTmXPQ qlzB9bGov95qfv8Q1i6qkPuSzR80NU0u9sYZfciLgmDf7ZbLfRz+7DTfKhZdwNbLfvk/ mr7fCC7EUp40O4m9y/B1i+626j8JaWTEKoiT41t4z+YO+lnqiA57h1RNwaG6W1tGjKl7 TCZhpAxqKtPqW6rjSjp8vkwERCK/h9qrzSu9SuBGqncehSgXS/uwkn0Uea3fhVXHbdS6 16qLPPIgw4Zr1bBUJbtKsZ5Je2AXTuULEu4zVyv9C/hQiYH4TXj0/rWC15hDbDbex5dx OGYQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.134.17 with SMTP id i17mr644681iod.75.1434104041174; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 03:14:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.15.33 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 03:14:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6228039c427b13187bfdf347b1771b10@kathe.in> References: <731c3f79950e679799b5f8078a5ba7f0@kathe.in> <917AE52A-45E0-42CB-A6A8-40BAAE318CC9@gmail.com> <1c5f3e6e3cafb9022d257afcce1757b3@kathe.in> <6ee4e8712a7499dd3d703e540f46059b@kathe.in> <23f251dd1a66d0a88ed041ae2593cb98@kathe.in> <6228039c427b13187bfdf347b1771b10@kathe.in> Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 03:14:01 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: randall hyde's high level assembly! From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk To: mayuresh@kathe.in Cc: Matthew Pherigo , FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 10:14:02 -0000 On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 3:02 AM, Mayuresh Kathe wrote: > On 2015-06-12 15:11, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 11:37 PM, Mayuresh Kathe >> wrote: >> >> On 2015-06-12 11:24, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Mayuresh Kathe >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> On 2015-06-12 11:04, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Mayuresh Kathe >>> wrote: >>> >>> hi matthew, >>> >>> no luck, I got the following message; >>> root@www:~ # pkg install hla >>> Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... >>> FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. >>> All repositories are up-to-date. >>> pkg: No packages available to install matching 'hla' have been >>> found in the repositories >>> >>> `uname -a` gives me the following; >>> FreeBSD www.kathe.in [1] [1] [1] 10.1-RELEASE-p10 FreeBSD >>> 10.1-RELEASE-p10 >>> #0: Wed May 13 06:54:13 UTC 2015 >>> root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC >>> amd64 >>> >>> `freebsd-version` gives me the following; >>> 10.1-RELEASE-p11 >>> >>> anything i might be doing wrong? >>> >>> ~mayuresh >>> >>> On 2015-06-12 09:26, Matthew Pherigo wrote: >>> Hey Mayuresh, >>> >>> There's actually a port in the tree already! 'pkg install hla' >>> >>> --Matt >>> >>> On Jun 11, 2015, at 5:52 AM, Mayuresh Kathe >>> wrote: >>> >>> has anyone been successful at working with randall hyde's high >>> level assembly toolkit under freebsd 10.x? >>> http://www.plantation-productions.com/Webster/ [2] [2] [2] claims >>> to >>> have a >>> pre-built archive, but one that fails to assemble the binaries. :( >>> >>> ~mayuresh >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> Is hla able to generate 64-bit machine code for amd64 ? >>> >>> It seems that it is for 32-bits , i.e. i386 . >>> >>> i have been able to run and test 'hla' under amd64 systems running >>> ubuntu. >>> any particular reason why it will not run under freebsd 64-bit? >>> one of the things that could be a problem might be the "assembler" >>> itself, i couldn't find "gas" or an equivalent under freebsd. >>> >>> ~mayuresh >>> >>> Can you use Nasm ? >>> >>> CD /USR/PORTS/DEVEL/NASM >>> MAKE INSTALL >>> >>> http://forum.nasm.us/index.php?topic=3D1283.0 [3] [3] >>> >> >> thanks for that tip mehmet, much appreciate it. >> >> i hadn't known about "nasm", looking it up led me to a book on >> assembly language programming by jeff duntemann, which seems to be a >> lot more realistic than the one by randall hyde. >> >> again, thanks a million mehmet. :) >> >> ~mayuresh >> >> 64 bits operating systems are different from 32 bits operating systems >> . >> >> During working with assemblers , it is necessary to distinguish this >> feature . >> >> In a 64 bits operating system , if 32 bits programs will be used , it >> is necessary to have 32 bits libraries and support by the operating >> system . >> >> This means that you can not execute 32 bits programs in a 64 bits >> operating system without such support . >> >> In the following page : >> >> http://www.duntemann.com/assembly.html [4] >> >> read >> >> "If You Have a 64-Bit PC..." >> >> the especially . >> >> "64-Bit PC" is misleading : It should be "64-Bit Operating System" . >> >> Both Intel and AMD x86 processors mainly support both 32 and 64 bit >> operating systems : They are able to execute 32 and 64 bit >> instructions . >> >> Therefore , important points are bit size of ( 32 or 64 ) operating >> system , and handling capability of this feature by compilers and >> availability of libraries , and support by the operating system . >> >> It is necessary to have information about 64 bit assembly programming >> in an 64 bit operating system . >> >> >> http://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Intel-Assembly-Language-Programming/d= p/1478119209/ref=3Dpd_sim_14_1?ie=3DUTF8&refRID=3D15NZ1SBWCZAMH1X6KPZG >> [5] >> >> Introduction to 64 Bit Intel Assembly Language Programming for Linux: >> Second Edition Paperback =E2=80=93 June 23, 2012 >> by Benjamin Ray Seyfarth (Author) >> > > mehmet, thanks for the link to that book by benjamin ray seyfarth. > > my objective for learning assembly was to understand the inner workings o= f > the machine, but i guess that could get accomplished with a good > understanding of "machine organization". > > randall hyde's "write great code (vol 1)" is an excellent book on "machin= e > organization", just that one of the languages used for example code is > 'hla' and hence my inquiry into support for running 'hla' under freebsd. > > best, > > ~mayuresh > > Using a widely adopted and supported by a community assembler such as "nasm" is much better than using a special purpose assembler ( for me with very useless statement kinds ) such as "hla" is a better approach when portability and maintainability of written sources over time is considered = . I have look at the "hla" many times and come to a conclusion "never use it" . If a high level language is required , "C" may be used . Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk