From owner-freebsd-net Thu Nov 5 00:15:46 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA02488 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 5 Nov 1998 00:15:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA02482; Thu, 5 Nov 1998 00:15:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA18273; Thu, 5 Nov 1998 00:15:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh cc: Andreas Klemm , Mike Tancsa , Juergen Nickelsen , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, jkh@FreeBSD.ORG, joerg@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipsec (VPN) for -current ? (Re: VPN through encrypted IP tunnel for FreeBSD? ) In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Nov 1998 16:53:18 +0900." <21126.910252398@coconut.itojun.org> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 00:15:46 -0800 Message-ID: <18269.910253746@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > mmm, if it gets committed, what happens to IPsec part of KAME stack? I was going to ask you that, actually. Do you guys have it decoupled, or is it tightly integrated, or...? Also, is IPsec in KAME finished at this time or is it a longer-term project? I guess we could tell Stephanie to find something else to do, but she's using the code actively at her ISP now and is apparently fairly keen on the technology getting into FreeBSD for the next release. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message