Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:06:44 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: d@delphij.net Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RFC: MI strlen() Message-ID: <86zlhw5zsr.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <4966B5D4.7040709@delphij.net> (Xin LI's message of "Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:26:28 -0800") References: <4966B5D4.7040709@delphij.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> writes: > Here is a new implementation of strlen() which employed the bitmask > skill in order to achieve better performance on modern hardware. Why bother? Do we have code that uses strlen() heavily in performance- critical regions? Does anybody? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86zlhw5zsr.fsf>