From owner-freebsd-chat Sat Oct 12 14:39:39 1996 Return-Path: owner-chat Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id OAA02162 for chat-outgoing; Sat, 12 Oct 1996 14:39:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hamby1.lightside.net (hamby1.lightside.net [207.67.176.17]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA02148 for ; Sat, 12 Oct 1996 14:39:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (jehamby@localhost) by hamby1.lightside.net (8.7.6/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA16094; Sat, 12 Oct 1996 14:42:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: hamby1.lightside.net: jehamby owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 12 Oct 1996 14:42:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Jake Hamby X-Sender: jehamby@hamby1.lightside.net To: Howard Goldstein cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Walnut Creek CDROM has a new look! In-Reply-To: <199610122124.RAA08209@bbs.mpcs.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sat, 12 Oct 1996, Howard Goldstein wrote: > Agreed, that would present a confusing look. How about this ordering: > > FreeBSD > FreeBSD Snapshot > Installing and Running FreeBSD > Linux > Linux Complete Reference > Linux Toolkit > > > That's a bit less confusing with the bonus of alphabetization for the anally > retentive amongst us :-) I vote for this ordering too! Walnut Creek should be emphasizing FreeBSD anyway, because: 1) Walnut Creek uses FreeBSD for their own Web/FTP servers 2) Walnut Creek is the primary distributor of FreeBSD 3) There are other, more popular distributions of Linux than what Walnut Creek sells But to be fair, maybe there should be two links: FreeBSD Linux Each one could point to a separate page discussing the resources available for that operating system. > -- > Howard Goldstein -- Jake Hamby