From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 15 23:25:36 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D8837B404 for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 23:25:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.chesapeake.net (chesapeake.net [205.130.220.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10A2243F75 for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 23:25:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Received: from localhost (jroberson@localhost) by mail.chesapeake.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3G6PZa84484 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 02:25:35 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 02:25:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Jeff Roberson To: threads@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030416022215.R76635-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: struct thread X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 06:25:37 -0000 Is td_last_kse necessary? What about td_lastcpu? They don't really seem to be used. Also, td_locks is unused, although it would be nice to have it implemented. td_sleeplocks should be ifdefed with WITNESS. Cheers, Jeff