From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 18 09:50:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9AAD10656C5 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 09:50:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no) Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (bizet.nethelp.no [195.1.209.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 08EA68FC18 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 09:50:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45653 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2010 09:24:14 -0000 Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (HELO localhost) (195.1.209.33) by bizet.nethelp.no with SMTP; 18 Dec 2010 09:24:14 -0000 Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 10:24:14 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <20101218.102414.74714683.sthaug@nethelp.no> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, dougb@FreeBSD.ORG, olli@lurza.secnetix.de From: sthaug@nethelp.no In-Reply-To: <201012180915.oBI9FSWA090563@lurza.secnetix.de> References: <4D0C49A2.4000203@FreeBSD.org> <201012180915.oBI9FSWA090563@lurza.secnetix.de> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: RFC: Upgrade BIND version in RELENG_7 to BIND 9.6.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 09:50:56 -0000 > > In order to avoid repeating the scenario where we have a version of BIND > > in the base that is not supported by the vendor I am proposing that we > > upgrade to BIND 9.6-ESV in FreeBSD RELENG_7. ... > > I vote for the upgrade. It's easy and seamless for users, > as far as I can tell, and it avoids problems in the long > run. I agree with you that the situation that we had with > FreeBSD 6 should be avoided. +1 here. I run several 7-STABLE boxes with BIND 9.6, no problems. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no