From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jan 21 21:13:51 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA13224 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 21:13:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhub.Stanford.EDU (mailhub.Stanford.EDU [36.21.0.128]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA13217 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 21:13:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from khan.stanford.edu (khan.Stanford.EDU [171.64.168.54]) by mailhub.Stanford.EDU (8.8.4/8.8.4/8.8.4L) with ESMTP id VAA16135; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 21:13:40 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199701220513.VAA16135@mailhub.Stanford.EDU> From: "Brandon C. Wood" To: Cc: Subject: Re: Intel Etherexpress Pro/10+ Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 21:13:50 -0800 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk OK...I installed it from a DOS partition. ---------- > From: David Greenman > To: Brandon C. Wood > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Intel Etherexpress Pro/10+ > Date: Tuesday, January 21, 1997 4:01 PM > > >Does the Etherexpress Pro/100B PCI driver support the Etherexpress Pro/10+ > >PCI card? Intel claims it's based on the same chip (in fact, in Windows > >95 and NT it says to use the 100B driver, which works fine), and FreeBSD > >seems to detect its parameters ok, but when I try to do an FTP install, it > >fails to initialize the network interface. I know my tcp/ip settings are > >correct, so I'm assuming it's a driver problem. > > The driver needs some minor changes to support the Pro/10+. If you can get > FreeBSD installed some other way, contact me after you've done that and I can > see about getting you a patch. > > -DG > > David Greenman > Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project