From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed May 9 3:30:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 486D137B422 for ; Wed, 9 May 2001 03:30:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f49AU8656628; Wed, 9 May 2001 03:30:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 03:30:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200105091030.f49AU8656628@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: David Malone Subject: Re: misc/27223: utility "du" shows incorrect disk usage when use -h option Reply-To: David Malone Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR misc/27223; it has been noted by GNATS. From: David Malone To: liugang@usa.net Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: misc/27223: utility "du" shows incorrect disk usage when use -h option Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 11:27:37 +0100 On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 12:15:53AM -0700, liugang@usa.net wrote: > >Release-Note: > >Audit-Trail: > >Unformatted: > >mkdir test > >du -h test > (output is:) 258M test I can't reproduce this here: % mkdir empty % du -h empty 1.0K empty % uname -r 4.2-STABLE I think the version of du is unchanged since 4.0, so I don't think the problem has been bugfixed. David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message