From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu May 16 20:31:42 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id UAA05144 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 16 May 1996 20:31:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hq.icb.chel.su (icb-rich-gw.icb.chel.su [193.125.10.34]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA05133 for ; Thu, 16 May 1996 20:31:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: (babkin@localhost) by hq.icb.chel.su (8.7.5/8.6.5) id JAA05519; Fri, 17 May 1996 09:10:13 +0600 (GMT+0600) From: "Serge A. Babkin" Message-Id: <199605170310.JAA05519@hq.icb.chel.su> Subject: Re: xircom hardware specs To: nate@sri.MT.net (Nate Williams) Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 09:10:13 +0600 (ESD) Cc: kevin@NDA.COM, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199605170031.SAA25091@rocky.sri.MT.net> from "Nate Williams" at May 16, 96 06:31:45 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > i'm using an nec versa 2200c laptop with a xircom ethernet+modem > > pcmcia card. no drivers available. > > Nope, because Xircom won't release the specs. w/out an NDA. > > > i sent email to xircom customer support and was informed that they > > would release the specs to interested developers. is anyone pursuing > > this? > > Nope, because signing an NDA means the source can't be distributed if a > driver is written. > > > ps next and solaris x86 provide xircom drivers, not sure if freebsd > > is kernel compat with them (probably not...) > > Nope, and NeXTStep and Solaris don't provide OS source, so signing an > NDA is not a problem. But it's possible to take say BSDI driver, disassemble it and make the specs publically available. -SB