From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 14:48:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29CBF16A4CE; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:48:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC16243D2D; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:48:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior-wifi.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8SEmpGH063508; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:48:52 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <41597957.5070805@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:46:47 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040831 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= References: <200409280654.i8S6s2Kx057818@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040928071943.GC14942@ip.net.ua> <20040928113125.GA71032@freebie.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pooker.samsco.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: Ruslan Ermilov cc: Colin Percival cc: Wilko Bulte Subject: Re: cvs commit: src UPDATING X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:48:20 -0000 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Wilko Bulte writes: > >>On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 10:19:43AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote.. >> >>>Then it's probably a right time to update stable-supfile in RELENG_5 >>>as well, as was pointed out by someone on -current. >> >>Not a good idea if you ask me. I'd rather rename that stable-supfile >>into 4-stable-supfile and add a 5-stable-supfile. We don't want people >>to unexpectedly to move to 5-stable or? > > > the stable-supfile in 4.x won't change, so people running 4.x will > keep getting 4.x, but people running 5.x will be able to use > stable-supfile to track 5.x. > > DES I specificallly asked Colin to not commit to stable-supfile since it is part of the re@ release checklist and will be handled at the appropriate time. Scott