From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 1 01:44:21 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4964116A417; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 01:44:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Received: from webaccess-cl.virtdom.com (webaccess-cl.virtdom.com [216.240.101.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D4F913C461; Mon, 1 Oct 2007 01:44:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Received: from [192.168.1.103] (c-67-160-44-208.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [67.160.44.208]) (authenticated bits=0) by webaccess-cl.virtdom.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l911iIDW090166 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:44:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 18:47:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Jeff Roberson X-X-Sender: jroberson@10.0.0.1 To: Peter Grehan In-Reply-To: <47004ACF.5020901@freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20070930184601.R583@10.0.0.1> References: <200709271639.l8RGdREd032105@repoman.freebsd.org> <46FBDFE8.9050909@freebsd.org> <20070930153101.T583@10.0.0.1> <47004ACF.5020901@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, Jeff Roberson , src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cognet@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern sched_ule.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 01:44:21 -0000 On Sun, 30 Sep 2007, Peter Grehan wrote: > Hi Jeff, > >>> ARM has it: > .. >> Did you verify that it works? > > No. Olivier would be able to answer though. If you can test ULE on UP arm/powerpc I'd appreciate it. Then we could add them to the set of supported architectures in ULE. > >> Does arm support SMP? It looks like it does not? > > Don't think so. > >> For UP it doesn't need to wait for blocked lock to clear but it does need >> to set td_lock. On UP there are no special synchronization requirements so >> it can happen as the very first instruction in cpu_switch. > > OK, I'll give it a whirl. > > later, > > Peter. > Thanks, Jeff