From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Oct 29 08:57:49 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA16278 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Thu, 29 Oct 1998 08:57:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from sasami.jurai.net (sasami.jurai.net [207.153.65.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA16269 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 1998 08:57:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from winter@jurai.net) Received: from localhost (winter@localhost) by sasami.jurai.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id LAA28185; Thu, 29 Oct 1998 11:57:30 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 11:57:30 -0500 (EST) From: "Matthew N. Dodd" To: Karl Denninger cc: Hallam Oaks , "hackers@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: Multi-terabyte disk farm In-Reply-To: <19981029105316.A27621@Denninger.Net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 29 Oct 1998, Karl Denninger wrote: > Hmmm... I'll look into this. We haven't gotten tag reduction warnings > on any of our NFS fileservers using these, nor on our INN machine > (which uses them in RAID 0+1 config). You'd proably only see it in RAID5 mode or if you were -really- beating on your array. Still, with that much memory they should make # of tags supported a tunable. I really want to find a cheap CRD-5440 just for kicks. 1 host and 2 disk channels is just right for a small server. -- | Matthew N. Dodd | 78 280Z | 75 164E | 84 245DL | FreeBSD/NetBSD/Sprite/VMS | | winter@jurai.net | This Space For Rent | ix86,sparc,m68k,pmax,vax | | http://www.jurai.net/~winter | Are you k-rad elite enough for my webpage? | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message